Instrumented Interconnecteds Intelligent

Adam Mossoff, Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law

By Adam Mossoff

The America Invents Act (AIA) was signed into law in September 2011, and it is rightly recognized as “the most significant reform of the U.S. patent system since 1836.”  The AIA’s provisions are not even fully implemented yet — its ink isn’t even dry, as we used to say in the analog world — but people are calling for more changes and reforms to the patent system.

This push for change is largely due to the widespread belief today that the “patent system is broken,” a trope repeated in many hyperbolic newspaper accounts and blog postings. The din about the “broken patent system” has become so incessant that USPTO Commissioner David Kappos recently stated in a speech at the Center for American Progress, “Give it a rest already. Give the AIA a chance to work. Give it a chance to even get started.”

Director Kappos’ sense of frustration is understandable. One of the primary examples that many people like to identify as Exhibit A of the “broken patent system” is the smart phone war between Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Google, and many other high-tech firms. Oftentimes, the smart phone war is characterized as merely part of an alleged “patent litigation explosion” that allegedly plagues the high-tech industry. Software patents in particular are now viewed by some commentators as a scourge of innovation.

But much of this public outcry about the “broken patent system” generally, and high-tech patents in particular, suffers from the same lack of context and careful consideration of the facts of which Director Kappos complained.

To take but one small example: despite the news reports on the smart phone war, few people know that patent litigation rates are roughly the same today as they were in the early nineteenth century.

The patent litigation rate today is around 1.5%.  As reported by award-winning economist, Zorina Khan, the average patent litigation rate between 1790 and 1860 was 1.65%.  In fact, for three decades in Khan’s study patent litigation rates were higher than today’s litigation rate. Between 1840 and 1849, for instance, patent litigation rates were 3.6% — more than twice the patent litigation rate today.

Moreover, so-called “patent wars” are nothing new. The first such patent war was the Sewing Machine War of the 1850s, which had all of the same issues as we see today in the smart phone war: numerous overlapping patents covering single products; high-profile lawsuits; expensive litigation; lawsuits in multiple venues; patent-licensing entities obtaining injunctions against manufacturers and entering into licensing agreements; patents sold and traded among firms, etc. It was even called the Sewing Machine War in the newspapers of the day. The patent-owners solved this morass of litigation by inventing a new, innovative business model: a cross-licensing arrangement between all the patent-owners that we now identify as a patent pool. In 1856, it was merely called “the Sewing Machine Combination,” and it operated successfully until its final patent expired in 1877. Today, we’re beginning to see similar types of commercial and legal arrangements in response to the smart phone wars, such as the December 2012 purchase of Kodak’s 1,100 patents by a consortium of firms.

As I also have detailed in my historical research, the Sewing Machine Combination unleashed tremendous technological and commercial innovation, including the first widespread civilian adoption of manufacturing with machine-tooled parts, and the invention of the first rent-to-own and trade-in programs. The result was that the sewing machine industry was fundamental to the success of the Industrial Revolution in the U.S. As is proven time and time again with patented innovation, an invention is merely the first step in a long process of dynamic innovation in both technology and commerce.

The end of the Sewing Machine War in 1856 was not the end of patent wars, as patent litigation continued to occur with each pioneering leap forward in technological innovation — the incandescent light bulb, telephone, automobile, airplane, and radio were all subjects of patent wars. The 1980s were dominated by the diaper wars and the stent wars, which are well known by patent litigators who worked at that time. If cutting-edge innovation in disposable diapers, a multi-billion-dollar industry, could be the subject of intense patenting and extensive litigation, then we shouldn’t be surprised to see it occur again in cutting-edge innovation in smart phones, tablet computers and other digital devices.

In fact, pharmaceutical patents were first accused in the early twentieth century of being plagued by vagueness, uncertainty, and extensive litigation — the same complaints we hear today about the allegedly unique problems with high-tech patents. This is ironic, because today’s critics of high-tech patents acknowledge that pharmaceutical patents are a field in which the patent system works. This just proves that disruptive technological innovation eventually leads to legal certainty and dynamic innovation. One hundred years from now, commentators will likely be pointing to software as one of the few fields in which patents work, and thus criticizing whatever new, unforeseeable, disruptive technology is being patented at that future date.

The point is that understanding historical innovation and even historical patent wars is important. These patent disputes were not resolved by Congress constantly amending the patent statutes year after year, or governmental agencies constantly changing the regulations on competition policy (as the FTC has done recently on “standard essential patents.”) No, these and the many other patent disputes throughout history were resolved by letting the courts do what they do best — resolving the legal disputes by securing valid patents on innovative technology against infringement, and signaling to both patent-owners and market participants that the patent system provides a stable legal framework to support the commercialization of these property rights through sales or licenses.

If there is going to be an end to the smart phone wars, just as there were ends to the previous patent wars, the best thing for Congress and governmental agencies to do right now is to sit back and let the courts do their jobs and let the AIA be implemented. In this way, inventors and patent-owners can continue to innovate in the technology and business models that have long been at the heart of U.S. economic prosperity.

Bookmark and Share

Previous post

Next post

17 Comments
 
October 1, 2014
9:08 am

Facebook is not the only social network.
Do not place all of your eggs in a single basket. Do your investigation and determine
what other social networks will very best offer a good return on your
investment. Focus on 1 or two other people such as Twitter and LinkedIn. facebook
likes appearing (Gregorio)


Posted by: Gregorio
 
October 1, 2014
1:26 am

FDA laser safety standards for identification, each 5-10 minutes, every 1 to 2 times will be
able to achieve the maximum effect, general hair loss after three weeks there will be improved signs of immature hair growth hair loss site, in the course of treatment after three months, you can see the thicker and darker hair grow.
During the treatment, the area is protected by using
a dynamic cooling device that spreads cryogen onto the
skin to cool the upper layer and facilitates you maximum comfort.
Warm water opens up the cuticle allowing you to clean the hair shaft, but if you use warm water
to rinse your hair the cuticle will stay open allowing moisture in and the hair shaft to swell.


Posted by: igrow low level laser equipment
 
September 24, 2014
9:33 am

Find a company that handles every aspect of a woman’s appearance, including make-up,
hair, dress style and body language. Spray tanning makes the skin golden brown, and not orange.
Social studies have shown that men and women both view a tanned body as being
healthier than a tanned body, but it is worth bearing in mind that if a sunbed is used for more than the recommended
amount of time, there is likely an ugly truth hiding behind
apparently healthy tanned skin.


Posted by: fake best after tan lotion reviews
 
September 11, 2014
1:16 pm

Having read this I believed it was really enlightening. I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this content together.
I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading and leaving comments.

But so what, it was still worthwhile!


Posted by: energy star program
 
August 29, 2014
1:05 pm

The basis for a diagnosis will start with a thorough examination by your
veterinarian. main light based permanent hair removal technique for
men. However, pulling on a scab that was adherent to the skin usually dislodged the graft – often several
days after pulling on a hair was safe.


Posted by: low level laser hair therapy results
 
August 21, 2014
12:44 pm

This will get you traffic to your site and make money.

Advertisers all over the place, advertising everything underneath the sun. To
report stolen email addresses at Yahoo, click Yahoo.


Posted by: drusselljuiceplus
 
August 13, 2014
8:18 pm

Let’s get started with the rosy situation coming from Fernando Torres , chief economist at IPmetrics,
retained by Mattocks’ side. In his submitted report ( read right
here ), he looks at factors like Television ratings and ancillary revenue from a third-party site called Sulia.com that pays for referrals.
Perhaps the most fascinating (and of course, controversial)
aspect of his report comes when he attempts to figure out what The Game ‘s Facebook web page would sell for if it was truly for sale.
facebook likes status – hardballalley.com -


Posted by: hardballalley.com
 
August 7, 2014
11:20 pm

I utilized a two step method to fit the actual model.
Very first, about 33% of the URLs don’t have any Facebook
shares and the rest have at least one share. Then, I match
a non-linear regression model to the remaining information with at least a single share.
facebook likes hack app (cloudhexa.zendesk.com)


Posted by: cloudhexa.zendesk.com
 
April 30, 2014
3:58 pm

Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful &amp it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me. kkefaeegkdbd


Posted by: Johnf830
 
March 30, 2014
7:03 pm

Great blog here! Additionally your site so much up very fast!

What web host are you the use of? Can I get your
affiliate link in your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol


Posted by: summer pedicure tips
 
February 21, 2014
3:12 pm

Magnificent issues altogether, you just picked up the symbol new viewer. Precisely what could you advocate relating to your publish for you to produced 7 days in the past? Any kind of convinced?


Posted by: patent
 
February 6, 2014
1:42 pm

Excellent post! We willl be linking to this particularly great article
on our website. Keep up the great writing.


Posted by: Executive Travel Old Knebworth
 
August 18, 2013
4:08 am

You actually make it appear really easy along with your presentation but I to find this matter to be actually one thing that I
feel I’d never understand. It seems too complex and very vast for me. I am looking ahead on your next post, I’ll attempt to
get the grasp of it!


Posted by: seo in india
 
August 16, 2013
5:49 am

Hello, i believe that i noticed you visited my
web site so i came to return the choose?.I’m trying to find issues to enhance my site!I suppose its adequate to make use of a few of your concepts!!


Posted by: Earle
 
August 16, 2013
1:49 am

Great Advice About Facebook Marketing That Anyone Can Easily Follow
visage *http://www.blogigo.com/moaningzero4977/Learn-How-SEO-Can-Skyrocket-Your-Business-and/3*


Posted by: http://www.blogigo.com/moaningzero4977/Learn-How-SEO-Can-Skyrocket-Your-Business-and/3
 
May 19, 2013
11:30 pm

Incandescent bulbs are manufactured in a wide range of sizes, light output, and voltage ratings, from 1.5 volts to about 300 volts. They require no external regulating equipment, have low manufacturing costs, and work equally well on either alternating current or direct current. As a result, the incandescent lamp is widely used in household and commercial lighting, for portable lighting such as table lamps, car headlamps, and flashlights, and for decorative and advertising lighting.;…;

http://www.caramoan.ph

Remember to look at our favorite web site


Posted by: Trinidad Amejorado
 
January 14, 2013
10:46 am

Very interesting article. I have been wondering about how the tech patent wars will shake out eventually and the history of other such “patent wars” is a good indication. Although the patent litigation rate is historically similar I’d be curious to know if the dollar amount of such lawsuits has ballooned given the advent of these new global markets.


Posted by: Dave
 
8 Trackbacks
 
January 8, 2014
7:52 am

[…] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation […]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | My Website / Blog
 
August 18, 2013
4:24 pm

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | Conumer Affar Fan Site
 
August 16, 2013
3:31 pm

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | Rip Off Reporte Insights
 
August 16, 2013
10:39 am

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | Conumer Affar Insights
 
August 16, 2013
7:35 am

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | Conumer Affar Issues
 
August 13, 2013
12:43 pm

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | Conumerr Affair Reports
 
August 13, 2013
8:02 am

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion | My Website / Blog
 
August 12, 2013
11:32 pm

[...] of a so-called “patent litigation explosion” today are just wrong.  As I detailed in another blog posting, the percentage of patent lawsuits today are not only consistent with historical patent litigation [...]


Posted by: The Myth of the “Patent Troll” Litigation Explosion « Truth on the Market
 
Post a Comment