Instrumented Interconnecteds Intelligent

Posted by
Elizabeth O'Brien in

Post feed

RSS 2.0

The analysis: Sharapova won two of their first three meetings, all in 2004. Since then Williams has won 12 straight with Sharapova winning 3 sets in those 12 matches. Both players have excellent, aggressive return games and strong first serves, but Serena has a more consistent 2nd serve and has been steadier from the baseline.

Sharapova is playing extreme tennis – she’s on the edge at all times – going for winners and risking errors. Serena is the more consistent of the two – going for winners when she’s in position to do so, keeping the ball in play and deep when she isn’t in a winning position. Sharapova knows that she can’t beat Williams playing her same go for broke style – she’ll need to use a bit more spin and angle to open up the court and keep Serena off balance, and then go for the winning shot when she has the opening.

It will be a tough task for Sharapova to defend her title here – Serena looks unbeatable and she has been for Sharapova for the last nine years.

The data:

Williams Highlights:

  • Her serve is the biggest weapon in women’s tennis – 31 aces – winning 76% of 1st serves & 62% of 2nd serves – top speed 124 mph – lost serve just 4 times (all 4 against Kuznetsova in the QF)
  • No safe place to hit to her – 63 forehand winners – 61 backhand winners – 176 total winners and just 100 unforced errors in 6 matches
  • She’s broken serve in 63% of her return games (that’s equivalent of letting her opponents serve every game and still winning each match 6-4, 6-3)

Sharapova Highlights:

  • Her 1st serve is a weapon – 22 aces (12 in her semifinal) – winning 72% of those points
  • Her 2nd serve is a risk reward shot – she will go for it, trying to hit lines and not backing down much in terms of speed – the results can be mixed – lots of aggressive 2nd serve and lots of double faults (26 in the tournament)
  • Strong return of service – winning 46% vs. 1st serves – winning 57% vs. 2nd serves – she’s won almost half of her return games

Screen Shot 2013-06-07 at 4.20.51 PM

Bookmark and Share

Previous post

Next post

4 Comments
 
September 29, 2014
1:54 pm

If some one needs expert view about blogging after that i
advise him/her to pay a quick visit this web site, Keep up the fastidious work.


Posted by: home business tips
 
September 28, 2014
5:39 am

You want to position a pool where it is viewable easily from both
indoors and outdoors for safety reasons.
These days, no one works for cheap, and so even basic landscaping is likely to cost home owners a bomb.
Hence, while planting the plant you should perform careful research.


Posted by: www.jorisvanlienen.nl
 
September 15, 2014
9:52 am

Il entra casino dans une île déserte. Damné animal
allume la lanterne, cherché à éclaircir le mystère, et, quoi qu’il advienne.
M Seurel de prendre; cela était facile de gouverner vos paroles, général, nous faisons aujourd’hui?


Posted by: casino en ligne
 
August 15, 2014
8:28 am

I am genuinely glad to glance at this website posts
which consists of tons of helpful facts, thanks for providing these information.


Posted by: remedies for lower back pain
 
2 Trackbacks
 
September 28, 2014
5:46 am

elpais.com.co

Women’s final: Williams vs. Sharapova | Game Changers


Posted by: elpais.com.co
 
June 8, 2013
7:22 pm

[...] The pre-match analysis here said, “Sharapova won two of their first three meetings, all in 2004.  Since then Williams has won 12 straight with Sharapova winning 3 sets in those 12 matches.  Both players have excellent, aggressive return games and strong first serves, but Serena has a more consistent 2nd serve and has been steadier from the baseline.  Sharapova is playing extreme tennis – she’s on the edge at all times – going for winners and risking errors.  Serena is the more consistent of the two – going for winners when she’s in position to do so, keeping the ball in play and deep when she isn’t in a winning position.  Sharapova knows that she can’t beat Williams playing her same go for broke style – she’ll need to use a bit more spin and angle to open up the court and keep Serena off balance, and then go for the winning shot when she has the opening.” [...]


Posted by: In the end Serena was too good. | Game Changers
 
Post a Comment